Shaping the Future. Together

The Future of Strategy

Since its birth in the 1960s, corporate strategy has continually addressed one core question: how to achieve sustainable competitive advantage? In the last 50 years, the underlying basis of advantage has shifted as business progressed through the decades and encountered new management challenges. This is most easily observable through the era of growth and market position strategies in the 1960s and 1970s, portfolio strategies in the 1980s, and capability strategies in the 1990s and 2000s. Looking to the future, how will companies compete successfully?

  • What is the future of strategy?

  • How has strategy evolved over time?

  • What is driving the change in core strategic concepts?

  • What are the New and Emerging Phenomena in Business?

  • What are the new and interesting strategic phenomena in business, industry, and the corporate environment which are changing the way corporations compete, plan, adapt, and change?

  • What changes in the business ecosystems are motivating the shift in the practice and meaning of strategy?

  • What are the Greatest Unanswered Questions in Corporate Strategy?

  • When is long term strategic planning needed to augment every compressing 2-3 year short term planning?

  • What are the limits of strategic planning?

  • What is the Modern Basis of Competitive Advantage?

  • How are today’s most successful companies competing, and who are they competing against?

  • How is the basis of competitive advantage evolving? A seemingly simple question grows increasingly relevant in light of modern phenomena such as globalization, rapid expansion in China and India, economic modularity, and many other mega-trends.


What are the Leading Unapplied Approaches from Other Disciplines?

 
Historically motivated by military and economic concepts, strategy and competitive advantage have evolved with time to incorporate new perspectives from disciplines such as ecology, environmental studies, biology, systems, engineering, and medicine. What conceptions of strategy and advantage can be translated from other disciplines? What are some leading edge strategy ideas from other fields that hold promising metaphors, and approaches to the discipline of Strategic Thinking? What promising or emerging analytical approaches might be used to solve problems in the academic domains?

Publications on Future of Strategy

Social Advantage
The increasing interdependence between business and society presents an opportunity for companies to develop “social advantage” by aligning the business and social dimensions of their strategies to create more sustainable, valued, and expansive business models. Creating social advantage goes beyond financial metrics to renewing depletable resources and goodwill, meeting and capitalizing on consumers’ ecological needs, and developing new markets around alternative and renewable resources. This Perspective cites three examples of companies that have succeeded in building social advantage. read
People Advantage
A company’s ability to adapt to incessant change is embodied in the way people make decisions and behave in the workplace. There is no adaptive strategy without an adaptive organization. Classical approaches to managing scale under stable conditions are too rigid for the rapid learning and change required in turbulent environments. Yet management paradigms die hard, especially when they have been the basis for historical success and offer the comforting illusion that a company can perfectly foresee and control its destiny. read
Signal Advantage
Signal advantage—the ability to rapidly capture, interpret, and act upon signals gleaned from rich and dynamic data—is essential today, when key business variables are volatile and difficult to forecast. Companies must act quickly on the right signals to modulate their operations, reinvent business models, and even reshape the information landscapes of their industries. This Perspective discusses how companies that are acquiring signal advantage are rethinking their approach to information and shifting from knowing and optimizing to learning and adapting. read
Adaptive Advantage
Traditional strategy becomes limited when variables are constantly shifting. Organizations with an adaptive advantage achieve superior outcomes by continuously reshaping the enterprise through a process of managed evolution. Readiness, responsiveness, and resilience are necessary for surviving turbulence, but a recursive approach—in which better strategies evolve iteratively in response to change—is essential for sustainable advantage. Choosing the best style of adaptive strategy depends on the rate and predictability of change in the industry and the degree of change it necessitates for the enterprise. read
New Bases of Competitive Advantage: The Adaptive Imperative
As traditional strategies of position and capability become less durable, they must be supplemented with adaptive advantages, which include advantages in signals, systems, social value, simulation, and people empowerment. Organizations with adaptive advantage recognize the unpredictability of today’s environment and the limits of deductive analysis. They seek a favorable context in which new approaches to new problems can continuously emerge. Adaptive advantages thus enable them to unite reflection with execution and balance deduction with experimentation. read
Thriving Under Adversity: Strategies for Growth in the Crisis and Beyond

Faced with a persistent economic slowdown, companies need to get beyond a bunker mentality. While a focus on short-term survival is important, executives must balance it with clear thinking on how to seize advantage now to emerge stronger in the recovery. A study of nature reveals four broad strategies for thriving in the face of adversity—and underscores the importance of resilience to long-term leadership. What can companies do to ensure survival, capture advantage, and foster resilience? read

Nature's Rules

Any one of us—and any one of our organizations—could be forgiven for behaving at the moment like a bear confronting winter. I don’t mean behaving “bearishly,” as investors do. No, I mean behaving literally like a bear—which is to say, shutting down the system. Hibernating. Certainly feels like the wise course just now. And haven’t we learned that nature is a sage guide to strategy?


Yes, but. First: History shows that the great winners in downturns are not those businesses that shrink production capacity, downsize the labor force and conserve cash until the economy picks up again. The winners are the ones that try to expand sales—the ones that grow. Second: Well, the bear isn’t the only creature in nature. Nature suggests many adaptive responses to a harsh or changing environment.

Survival is first. But leaders must also ask themselves how they will gain advantage coming out of the downturn.


Not that the bear’s response to economic winter is all wrong. Hibernation can be an effective strategy, if certain assumptions hold. (Length of winter; adequate fat; return of normal world in spring.) Unfortunately, it’s already becoming clear that—this time—those assumptions are unlikely to hold up.

Martin Reeves, "Natures Rules", Sloan Managment Review, March 2009 

Strategy Institute Network

Meet the people who keep our perspectives fresh, the members of our Strategy Institute network. more

Collaboration and Dialogue

Find out about collaborating with the Strategy Institute through our dinner series, panels, and dialogue. more

Contact Us

Leave a message for the Strategy Institute. Go

BCG Offices

GlobeBCG has more than 60 offices around the world. Learn about our global presence.
Go


How to Apply

Interested in joining BCG? Apply by using our online application. More

Bookmark This Page