Partner & Managing Director
The Other Technology Strategy Every IT Leader Needs
To build advantage, organizations must do more than just change. They must transform. As technology’s role in business becomes ever more important, transformations will increasingly be underpinned by significant technology programs. In such technology-enabled transformations, IT leaders need two different strategies to ensure success.
One is a strategy for delivering significant changes, such as digitizing operations, replacing or modernizing systems, and standardizing infrastructure and applications. As part of this strategy, IT leaders must also develop the necessary tactics, multiyear roadmaps, and plans to deliver the technology to support the business transformation.
The second strategy, which is often overlooked, must ensure that the IT organization itself has the right functional capabilities to drive and sustain the transformation. Organizations that reap material benefits from transformations are those with the right organizational capabilities in place—the right team, organization, processes, tools, and culture—to become truly world class. (See Transformation: The Imperative to Change, BCG report, November 2014.) In a technology-enabled transformation, the maturity of the IT team’s capabilities is especially important.
To get their organizations fit to support a transformation, IT leaders must develop a strategy and design an explicit plan to assess and develop the capabilities they need to make the transformation successful. The plan must consider how well IT management functions and disciplines are embedded and executed across the business and encompass functions such as IT planning, sourcing, delivery, budgeting, and benefits realization.
When technology-enabled transformations fail, they fail hard. Average performance is not good enough. (See Exhibit 1.) In most cases, that failure arises not because intent or talent is lacking but because the IT organization is not fit to complete the multiyear marathon that a transformation represents. Common weaknesses include inadequate management of the portfolio, program, and projects, which can erode the full benefits of the transformation, and poor capabilities in managing vendors and contracts, which can allow costs and scope to spiral out of control.
An unfit IT organization can jeopardize a technology-enabled transformation and with it benefits worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
In contrast, fit IT organizations deliver transformation programs more consistently and predictably, make better trade-offs and resource-allocation decisions, and work more effectively and efficiently internally and with third parties, including vendors and system integrators. (See “Getting the IT Function Fit to Support a Global Operating Model.”)
A leading company with more than 100,000 employees and a global footprint was pursuing a major transformation to establish a global operating model that would allow it to run standard processes and maintain common structures across geographically separate operations and business functions. It wanted to build a leaner, more productive, and flexible organization through standardization, global efficiencies, and insights from standard planning and operations.
Technology was a critical enabler for the target state, based on standard enterprise-resource-planning systems, desktop operating environments, and global infrastructure. To move toward a global operating model, the company needed to transform the way it delivered technology by using standard, cloud-based, and smarter-sourced technology assets and service inputs.
To get the IT organization fit for transformation, the company developed a roadmap for the three most critical areas:
The plan drew heavily on the IT-CMF to frame the analysis and discussions; provide clear, business-value implications for investing in functional capabilities; and describe the practices, outcomes, and metrics for success necessary to strengthen these critical capabilities.
The completed functional-technology strategy, roadmap, and detailed implementation plans were incorporated into the company’s overall IT strategy, with strong resourcing and senior-executive commitment. With the potential to reduce technology costs by as much as 30 percent, the investment in functional-technology capabilities is already returning multiples of investment, within a very short time frame. This investment is now seen as central to the success of the company’s ongoing technology-enabled transformation and productivity agendas.
To develop their fit, transformation-ready IT strategy, leaders must answer three questions:
An IT organization can rely on a framework called the IT Capability Maturity Framework (IT-CMF) to answer these questions. The IT-CMF was developed by the Innovation Value Institute, a global consortium that brings together a broad set of industry practitioners, academics, and corporate advisors; The Boston Consulting Group is a founding member. The IT-CMF is the only framework that explicitly aligns IT with business value.
The framework provides a structured and comprehensive set of 32 capabilities linked to the ways in which IT drives value. Individual capabilities are supported by an objective set of criteria to assess or demonstrate maturity and metrics to measure the contribution to business value. These capabilities fall into nine groups that address the different ways that technology drives value to the business:
Which capabilities are needed? To get transformation ready, an IT organization first needs a clear view of its current capabilities. Then, it can pinpoint the capabilities it needs to strengthen when getting fit for a particular transition—particularly important because required capabilities vary by type of transformation. (See Exhibit 2.)
For example, when contemplating a fundamental shift in operating models such as a core-system modernization, capabilities associated with large-program delivery will be the most critical. In contrast, during a structural-cost transformation, capabilities such as sourcing management and cost management will be essential to deliver a simpler and more efficient IT environment. And a transformation that focuses on digital innovation should focus on strengthening the capabilities encompassed in the IT-enabled business innovation group (among others) to drive alignment, innovation, and collaboration between the business and IT teams.
The relevance of different capabilities also differs over time. In the early stages of a transformation, when funding the journey is the priority, the cost management group is likely to be prominent, for example, and portfolio, program, and project delivery will come to the fore once savings have been reinvested in IT.
The IT-CMF can provide invaluable guidance for organizations that seek to pursue a variety of strategic imperatives. Some organizations will use the framework to reduce costs in the face of high IT spending, and others will use it to target areas for investment to improve capabilities. It can also be used to align the capabilities an organization has currently with those it needs for the future.
One organization faced serious issues about the governance of its large IT-enabled transformation programs, which were worth more than $500 million. The company had about a dozen large IT programs under way, and management was fielding regular requests from each for more funds. As a result, senior management and the board of directors were losing faith in the organization’s ability to manage multiple large technology programs at the same time. Using the IT-CMF framework, the company was able to identify the necessary changes to get the transformation programs back on track: improved management of the overall technology-investment portfolio, better program and project management, and more effective ways of assessing and monitoring benefits, to ensure that they were actually delivered.
A large Asian bank with an ambitious digital agenda but immature capabilities and ad-hoc service-management processes serves as another example. Its outsourcing arrangements were not well managed, and its IT architecture was not digital ready. Talent management was also a major issue. Using the IT-CMF, we designed a new organization structure that optimized spans of control, improved decision making, and introduced an initiative to nurture new capabilities in the areas of digital, enterprise architecture, and analytics. Ultimately, the plan led to improvements in the total cost of ownership, turnaround time, and quality of service delivery.
How good must the capabilities be? Getting IT fit for transformation requires strengths in particular capabilities. Too often, capability improvement is considered a business-as-usual activity and does not attract the funding or attention it needs in the context of transformation.
The IT-CMF provides a comprehensive, broad assessment that allows organizations to benchmark their IT functions against those of peers in similar industries. The assessment process is fast and instructive, highlighting clear capability gaps and providing global benchmarking. The results remain clearly linked to required business outcomes.
A practical way to apply the framework is for IT and business leaders to jointly work though the priority capabilities and their relative importance and then determine the target level of maturity. This exercise not only gives senior stakeholders insights into the highest-priority capabilities but also builds stronger engagement between the business and IT.
Exhibit 3 is an example of one organization’s current functional IT capabilities, future aspirations, and comparison with industry peers. This type of output can support decision making about which capabilities an organization should invest in to become fit for transformation. Notably, this example shows that an organization’s own perspective of the capabilities that matter most for a transformation is often different from the capabilities identified using an objective, evidence-based framework like the IT-CMF.
For a company that was shifting to a global operating model for technology and a global sourcing model, the IT-CMF assessment indicated the need to invest in the IT organization’s capabilities for cost accounting and allocation, service management, and supplier management, as well as in systems to support packaging and billing the IT services that the function provided to the business.
What is the right way to improve capabilities? Improving organizational capabilities is hard. It typically takes 18 to 24 months of focused, well-resourced, and disciplined effort to lift a single capability area by one maturity level. This effort will include embedding accountabilities, processes, tools, and decision making.
The IT-CMF defines the set of activities an organization must undertake to reach the next level of maturity. For example, to move up from level 2 to level 3 in project and program management, where IT contributes directly to business value rather than just being a service provider, requires the following steps:
Typically, these activities will translate into a portfolio of three to ten initiatives, with time frames ranging from 3 months for rapid, quick-win enhancements to 18 to 24 months for more-structural reforms. The work needs to be supported by clear accountabilities, milestones, and definitive metrics that can demonstrate improvement in functional capabilities. Including these initiatives within the wider organization’s project portfolio in terms of getting approval and funding is essential to making sure they get done. Regular reporting on progress helps to maintain momentum by securing strong commitment and decisiveness from the most senior leaders of the IT business.
For example, a European bank was spending more than €150 million a year on IT infrastructure and seeking to unlock savings. The IT-CMF revealed key capability gaps in the bank’s technical infrastructure and a clear need to increase maturity for most of the IT-CMF’s critical processes and life-cycle phases. As well as identifying quick wins, the resulting strategy focused on closing long-term capability gaps in two key areas. On the basis of a three-month assessment, the bank was able to save several million euros annually by improving its decommissioning practices.
Leading organizations that use the IT-CMF undertake periodic (often, annual) benchmarking of their IT capability maturity to assess how far they have progressed toward their goal of becoming fit for transformation.
Organizations that systematically strengthen their most critical functional IT capabilities early in a transformation are consistently better at delivering on the promised value. Indeed, an explicit and early focus on the most critical capabilities and the right investments in resources, effort, and management attention are what separates success from failure.
While the task may seem daunting, in practice, we have seen highly committed organizations use reliable and tested tools like the IT-CMF to enhance their most critical transformation capabilities in the course of just a few months. In this way, organizations can get fit quickly and lay the foundation for a successful business transformation.