Compared with many other sectors, industrial machinery’s digital transformation has hardly been swift. To be sure, suppliers of everything from manufacturing equipment to tractors have begun the journey. They’re embedding digital technologies and connectivity into their hardware and mining data to predict maintenance needs, deliver value-added services to customers, and equip factories of the future.
But thus far, most machinery and industrial-automation OEMs are achieving only incremental advances from their digital endeavors—not blockbuster leaps. And they’re behind the curve when it comes to full digital transformations that span their operating models, processes, technology platforms, ways of working, and customer engagement. For these reasons, the digital initiatives of most industrial goods companies have yet to fully translate into superior financial performance.
To gauge their digital progress, we took an in-depth look at dozens of machinery and industrial- automation companies around the world. At first glance, we saw little direct correlation between digital sophistication and revenue and profit margin growth. But when we dug deeper, interesting patterns emerged. We found that machinery makers with the strongest financial performance are far better at executing their digital vision and strategies. They are especially more advanced in creating digitally empowered services and solutions and implementing agile ways of working. They’re also much stronger in digital innovation, successful lighthouse and rapid prototyping projects, creation of new digital businesses, and customer-centric business models. Many financial underperformers, by contrast, fail to get their digital ambitions into execution mode.
These findings highlight the capabilities where underperforming machinery and industrial-automation companies should target their investments in order to close the gap with market leaders—and where high performers can focus to become even stronger.
We interviewed executives at 81 machinery and industrial-automation companies in the US, Europe, Japan, and China in six industry segments: automation components, general-purpose equipment, mechanical components, off-highway vehicles and mobile machinery, industrial plants, and stationary and shop floor machinery. We assessed 53 digital-maturity checkpoints for each company and generated scores based on BCG’s Digital Acceleration Index (DAI), which identifies where companies lag and where they have a competitive edge. We grouped the surveyed companies into four categories:
Overall, the industrial-machinery sector is at the literate stage of its digital journey. (See Exhibit 1.) It’s well behind sectors such as consumer goods, finance, and health care, and even lags the public sector. In terms of market segments, only automation components and off-highway vehicles are at the cusp of performer status; industrial plants and stationary machinery are barely past the starter stage. This is more or less true regardless of region: although European machinery companies post higher DAI scores on average than those of China, Japan, and the US, they still rank only as literates.
We found that machinery companies in the vanguard of digital adoption are much more successful at executing their digital strategies. Machinery companies with DAI scores of 60 or higher (which we call “champions”) far outpace laggards (those with scores of 35 or lower) on eight key building blocks that relate to operations. These building blocks include “purpose and strategy”—a company’s overarching goals—as well as digital capabilities, talent, and work environment.
We refer to the difference between a company’s DAI score on purpose and strategy and its scores on the other seven operational building blocks as the digital execution gap. For champions, this gap is only around 7%, on average. But for laggards, it averages 55%. (See Exhibit 2.)
To determine whether there is any correlation between digitization and long-term market success, we analyzed financial indicators for each company, including revenue and profit growth over the past five years. We found little direct correlation between digital leadership and superior revenue and profit margin growth. This finding held true regardless of market segment or region.
The picture was different, however, when we compared machinery companies with the best financial results over the past five years and those with the weakest. We identified 15 financial high performers, companies whose compound annual growth in both revenue and EBIT margin was at least 2 percentage points above the average for the entire industrial-machinery sector. These high performers averaged annual growth of 6% in revenue and 9% in earnings over those five years. At the other extreme, 10 financial underperformers posted annual growth of –2% in revenue and –10% in earnings over the same period.
The financial high performers averaged DAI scores of 43, while the underperformers averaged 33. This difference is significant enough to suggest a link between digital sophistication and financial results over time.
The contrast between high performers and underperformers grew sharper when we examined DAI scores on specific digital checkpoints. Eight checkpoints in particular stood out as making a difference in financial performance. We identified four of them as key “differentiators” of digital success: service operations, prototype and lighthouse projects that serve as models, innovation power, and the building of new businesses. In addition, we found that pricing and artificial intelligence are key “enablers” of digital success. Finally, digital talent and customer centricity are cross-organizational cultural factors.
Our analyses revealed significant differences between the DAI scores of financial high performers and underperformers on each of these digital checkpoints. (See Exhibit 3.) Some of the largest gaps—of more than 20 points—were in innovation power and new-business creation. High performers ranked as literates only in pricing and AI, however, suggesting that even the most digitally sophisticated machinery companies are struggling to make their digital offerings available at the right prices for customers. (As they become more sophisticated in AI, these companies should be able to adjust their prices to take into account such factors as geography, the level of competition, and technological differentiation.) Still, financial high performers are ahead of underperformers, which remain at the starter stage in pricing and AI. High performers also had good scores in the cultural differentiators of digital talent and customer centricity, although the gaps with underachievers were a bit smaller.
Several leading machinery companies illustrate the advantage of being a high financial performer as well as digitally mature. A number of them, for example, have introduced digitally empowered products:
Machinery and industrial-automation companies can start improving their financial performance by focusing on the following:
Our benchmarking of the machinery and industrial-automation sector’s digital maturity in relation to other industries indicates that there are many unmet opportunities for digitization. Companies can begin to tackle the process by doing the following:
A full digital transformation is a multiyear journey that usually requires holistic change across the organization before it produces dramatic results. Beginning that journey now can not only start improving financial performance immediately but secure competitive advantage well into the future.