Growth Share Matrix

What Is the Growth Share Matrix?

The creation of the growth share matrix was a collaborative effort. BCG’s Alan Zakon—who would go on to become the firm’s CEO—first sketched it and then refined it together with his colleagues. BCG’s founder, Bruce Henderson, popularized the concept in his essay The Product Portfolio, in 1970. At the height of its success, the growth share matrix was used by about half of all Fortune 500 companies; today, it is still central in business school teachings on business strategy.

The growth share matrix is, put simply, a portfolio management framework that helps companies decide how to prioritize their different businesses. It is a table, split into four quadrants, each with its own unique symbol that represents a certain degree of profitability: question marks, stars, pets (often represented by a dog), and cash cows. By assigning each business to one of these four categories, executives could then decide where to focus their resources and capital to generate the most value, as well as where to cut their losses.

How Does the Growth Share Matrix Work?

The growth share matrix was built on the logic that market leadership results in sustainable superior returns. Ultimately, the market leader obtains a self-reinforcing cost advantage that competitors find difficult to replicate. These high growth rates then signal which markets have the most growth potential.

The matrix reveals two factors that companies should consider when deciding where to invest—company competitiveness, and market attractiveness—with relative market share and growth rate as the underlying drivers of these factors.

Each of the four quadrants represents a specific combination of relative market share, and growth:

  1. Low Growth, High Share. Companies should milk these “cash cows” for cash to reinvest.
  2. High Growth, High Share. Companies should significantly invest in these “stars” as they have high future potential.
  3. High Growth, Low Share. Companies should invest in or discard these “question marks,” depending on their chances of becoming stars.
  4. Low Share, Low Growth. Companies should liquidate, divest, or reposition these “pets.”

As can be seen, product value depends entirely on whether or not a company is able to obtain a leading share of its market before growth slows. All products will eventually become either cash cows or pets. Pets are unnecessary; they are evidence of failure to either obtain a leadership position or to get out and cut the losses.

Learn More About the Growth Share Matrix

BCG Classics Collection

From building the ideal product portfolio to the rule of three and four, explore more than 50 years of BCG business strategy classics.

Meet BCG’s Experts on the Growth Share Matrix

Featured Insights: BCG’s most inspiring thought leadership on issues shaping the future of business and society.