Managing Director & Partner
R&D departments can play a critical role in helping manufacturers achieve their net-zero environmental goals. Companies across industries are reducing their CO2 emissions by optimizing their supply chains and creating new business models, among other initiatives. But there are additional aspects of environmental sustainability—natural-resource depletion, ecosystem changes, and pollution—that also need to be addressed. To tackle all the challenges, manufacturers must reevaluate how they design both new and existing products. In fact, a product’s design influences as much as 80% of its environmental impact, according to the European Commission.
In our experience, companies can reduce a product’s environmental impact by up to 40% by utilizing conventional design technologies. But to fully eliminate that impact, they will need to use next-generation deep tech, such as architected materials, synthetic biology, and universal printing. The strong business case for investments in these technologies includes reducing costs (by limiting exposure to CO2 taxes and energy cost fluctuations, for example), gaining competitive advantages, and promoting regulatory compliance.
R&D departments can use six complementary strategies to guide their sustainable-design efforts. But they cannot apply these strategies on their own. They must collaborate with an innovation ecosystem that includes suppliers, operations and sustainability experts, and academics. Such partnerships are crucial to making the right tradeoffs involving cost, environmental impact, and customer perception.
A product’s design strongly influences its ecological sustainability because numerous engineering-related aspects affect the environment, including the product’s composition, lifespan, efficiency, and recyclability. Measuring the impact provides insights that companies can use to apply design strategies that promote sustainability.
To determine where to focus their efforts, companies need to identify a product’s environmental impact across its life cycle—from sourcing and manufacturing to usage and end of life. The assessment should consider the planetary boundaries—such as limits to ozone depletion and ocean acidification—that will maintain a stable environment and decrease the risk of irreversible change. As shown in Exhibit 1, companies should assess four factors to gain this kind of comprehensive view:
For each factor, companies must choose KPIs that align with their overall sustainability goals and areas of focus. These KPIs can be used to track progress over time and set targets.
We have grouped sustainable-design principles into six complementary strategies that address all of these factors across the product life cycle. (See Exhibit 2.) Each strategy offers opportunities but also presents challenges.
Companies can find ways to use less material in products or packaging while still providing the required functionality. Significant benefits are possible across the entire life cycle, generally in proportion to the level of material reduction.
In addition to using less material, companies can take advantage of digitization—that is, substituting software for analog features. With digitization, features can be added without increasing a product’s weight or the amount of material used. Software also provides more flexibility for future adaptations. Applying a “less is more” principle to material usage creates opportunities to develop new business models that promote sustainability while reducing costs and meeting customer needs.
In defining a dematerialization strategy, companies should consider the need to influence the preferences and mindset of consumers. For example, the preference of many drivers for spacious and fully equipped vehicles will need to change before smaller cars with fewer features gain acceptance. Moreover, manufacturers must find ways to ensure the same level of safety and security in vehicles with leaner construction and fewer high-tech features.
2. Next-Best Material Selection
Companies can often select materials that minimize a product’s environmental impact without significantly diminishing its functionality. Options include biodegradable, recycled, recyclable, or lightweight materials. For example, researchers at Clemson University have developed a plant-based substitute for the polyurethane foam commonly used in car seats and mattresses. This durable, bio-based material is recyclable and avoids the health risks associated with polyurethane.
Weight reduction is an important consideration in selecting materials. Lower weight can reduce energy use over a product’s lifetime. One startup automaker has found that using lightweight composite materials reduces a vehicle’s energy consumption by 50%.
Switching to alternative materials is not easy, however. Next-best materials are often more expensive than traditional ones. Moreover, selecting materials entails a complex set of considerations and criteria, including physical properties, compatibility, safety, and supply.
3. Green Supply Chain
To promote a greener supply chain, companies can select materials, parts, and components that reduce the environmental impact of logistics and production. They can also design production processes to shorten supply chains. A greener supply chain can reduce costs by reducing energy consumption and facilitating the use of more resilient processes and digitization. Capturing these benefits requires transparent and effective collaboration among R&D, production, supply chain teams, and suppliers.
4. Longevity and Effective Usage
Companies can improve and extend a product’s useful life by designing it to facilitate repairs, upgrades, and adaptations. Products can also be designed to allow for multiple uses or remanufacture for other uses.
Although extending product lifetimes can delay consumers’ adoption of new products and reduce revenues, companies can still capture many benefits. For example, product longevity can increase customer loyalty and enhance a brand’s reputation. Companies can also charge a premium for products with longer lifespans, which consumers often regard as being of higher quality. Finally, companies can generate additional revenue through repair and maintenance services.
5. Product Efficiency
An efficient product is one that consumes the minimum possible amount of energy and material resources. Improving efficiency is the best way to reduce the carbon footprint during use, which is typically when the highest level of emissions occurs. Consumers, too, want more efficient products, in order to counteract high energy prices.
In designing more efficient products, companies must consider the tradeoffs with other benefits. For example, large, comfortable vehicles, such as SUVs loaded with features, are comparatively inefficient to operate.
Circularity is essential to reducing the consumption of materials and energy. It can be promoted by sourcing recyclable materials as well as by designing a product for “second life” uses. For example, because remanufacturing requires much less energy than extracting the primary materials from which a product was made, it significantly reduces energy consumption and carbon emissions. Eventually, once the circular value chain is mature and optimized, secondary materials will cost less than primary materials.
Designing for circularity is challenging, however. The life cycle of an engineered product involves numerous suppliers with which companies must collaborate to develop an efficient circular design. There are also financial hurdles. For example, even when a mature process for recycling a component exists, it may not be economical if demand for the material is low or the cost of recycling exceeds the resale value.
Vehicle seats are a case in point. Recycling intact seats is not profitable because their resale value is much lower than the cost of removal. As a result, the metal that makes up 75% of vehicle seats is typically recycled, while the remaining materials are incinerated.
To support their efforts, companies need to establish six enablers:
A systematic approach to reducing the environmental impact of products has four main steps.
Create a baseline. Develop a detailed quantitative and qualitative baseline of environmental impact that encompasses the climate impact, natural-resource usage, ecosystem changes, and pollution associated with the product across its life cycle. In addition, examine how your competitors are designing products for sustainability and assess how those efforts could affect your competitive position in the market. This includes examining technological trends (such as by identifying valuable new patents) and comparing designs through teardowns of competitors’ products.
Generate ideas. Apply the six strategies to generate ideas for sustainable designs. Create a multidisciplinary team to lead the effort, including operation experts, design experts, suppliers, venture capital investors, climate and sustainability experts, and academics. It is more effective to generate ideas for optimizing designs at the product level than at the component level.
Evaluate and prioritize ideas. Evaluate and prioritize ideas with respect to three criteria: environmental improvement, cost impact, and customer value. (See Exhibit 3.) The most promising initiatives promote substantial environmental improvements and reduce costs, while also being appreciated by consumers. However, companies will often need to make tradeoffs among these criteria.
Test the feasibility of ideas. Evaluate the practicality and potential for success of each idea. Use an agile and iterative approach so that developers can gather customer feedback during the development phase. If possible, conduct a pilot to gather real-world data and feedback before fully committing to an idea.
Beyond the benefits to society, there is a strong business case for designing products to reduce their environmental impact. Companies can achieve short-term cost savings and long-term competitive advantages by meeting consumer demand for sustainable products and preparing to comply with new laws and regulations. Indeed, for many companies, long-term viability is at stake. The challenges arising from resource depletion and climate change have made sustainable practices, including design principles, essential to maintaining a business over the long run. Companies that take steps today to capture the full range of sustainable-design benefits will position themselves to thrive in the decades ahead.
ABOUT BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP
Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholders—empowering organizations to grow, build sustainable competitive advantage, and drive positive societal impact.
Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that question the status quo and spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting, technology and design, and corporate and digital ventures. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, fueled by the goal of helping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place.
© Boston Consulting Group 2023. All rights reserved.
For information or permission to reprint, please contact BCG at email@example.com. To find the latest BCG content and register to receive e-alerts on this topic or others, please visit bcg.com. Follow Boston Consulting Group on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter).