A sharp value creation strategy not only ensures that a great business is a great stock—but it also helps deter activist attacks.
A linear approach to strategy—first defining a business strategy, then developing a supporting financial strategy, and finally selling that package to investors—may seem logical, but it’s often not optimal.
The approach falls short because of the many interdependencies among business, financial, and investor strategies. Only by developing all three iteratively and in parallel—exploring multiple scenarios—can an organization maximize its total shareholder return (TSR).
In our value creation strategy work for clients, we:
Shareholder activism is on the rise. From 2005 through 2019, the number of activist attacks globally grew from 54 to 191—a rate of more than 9% per year. And it’s not just subpar performers that are targeted. Nearly one-third of companies attacked from 2016 through October 2020 were delivering three-year total shareholder returns above the S&P Global 1200 median as of the month prior to the attack—and more than half of those also had a forward price-earnings ratio above the S&P Global 1200 median.
Defending against an activist attack is costly—and not just in dollar terms. Management time that could be spent building medium-term advantage is diverted to the short-term crisis. Asking one question can help build immunity to activists: how to create value that beats peers?
BCG is the only major consulting firm that has an explicit policy against working for shareholder activists. We only support our corporate clients in preparing for and responding to activist demands. Using our proven proprietary toolkit, we rapidly identify the ways to unlock value and the transformational moves that mitigate activism risk.
BCG has published annual rankings of the top value creators—and perspectives on value creation trends—since 1998. Explore the full series, including the latest rankings, here.
Reversals in TSR performance since the start of the year have hit innovation-driven industry sectors such as technology, medical technology, financial infrastructure, and green energy especially hard.
Exactly how the world will reach net zero is unknown, but at a macro level the science and economics define a pretty clear path. Given the magnitude of value at stake during the transition, many leaders are concluding that inaction may be the riskiest strategy of all.
The worst question an activist can ask is the one you haven’t thought about. With activism on the rise, leaders need to put their plans to the test and be ready to defend them.
BCG’s latest research finds investors increasingly bearish on the economy and the stock market—and they want businesses to focus on both liquidity and long-term advantage.
With a new era for business come new benchmarks for what constitutes a good company, a good investment, and a good leader. Here’s the CEO’s agenda for creating business value while contributing to the common good.
Whether your organization is seeking to ignite a new wave of value creation, justify a high multiple, guard against an activist attack, or overcome a new activist campaign, BCG has the relevant experience. For example, we helped:
A North American soft-goods manufacturer understand why its market returns were below par despite strong fundamentals. The revised business, financial, and investor strategies we developed increased their TSR, price-to-earnings ratio, and stock price by 30% when compared with the market and the company’s peers.
A global logistics player break a cycle of underperformance and adopt value-based management practices that led to a new performance trajectory with TSR 10% above the market.
A major enterprise tech player prepare for and inoculate against a potential activist attack by analyzing an array of potential portfolio moves, cost reductions, and financial policy choices. The work led to two scenarios forecast to boost valuation by as much as 100%. The strategy ultimately outperformed by warding off an attack and leading to a doubling of the company’s share price within two years.
A leading global biopharma company respond decisively to a hostile takeover attempt by a competitor and an activist. Rapidly exploring strategic options, we helped the company develop a plan in six weeks to reduce costs by more than 15%, creating roughly $30 billion in incremental value and enabling the company to attract a white-knight acquirer.
