Saved To My Saved Content

Medtech companies know they need to reduce costs, but many often take a limited approach, with isolated programs that target individual functions and business units. To generate better results, they should think end to end, launching comprehensive cost programs that target the entire enterprise.

In our experience, medtech cost programs that start with procurement produce quick wins, build a data-driven foundation for change, and spur innovation. This builds momentum and generates funds for a more cross-functional, comprehensive cost program that can shave 7% to 12% off a company’s total cost baseline and increase gross margins by up to 3%. In addition, AI and GenAI can create a multiplier effect, making functions such as IT services, media, and translations far more efficient. (See “The Multiplier Effect from AI.”)

The Multiplier Effect from AI
Across industries, companies are leveraging AI and GenAI to amplify cost reduction programs. Common applications include the following:
  • Analytics. Investments in AI-based tools for inventory, forecasting, and operations planning are helping teams respond more effectively to demand volatility and making supply chains more resilient and responsive. Predictive analytics can increase equipment uptime and productivity in service operations.
  • Automation and Digital. Warehouse and logistics automation is being used to reduce cost and improve speed, accuracy, and labor efficiency. Broader supply chain digitization continues across fulfillment, storage, and planning systems.
  • Marketing Efficiencies. Companies are using GenAI to make marketing teams more efficient and effective across internal processes and in their dealings with agencies.

As Headwinds Grow, Companies Need to Protect Margins

The medtech industry faces an increasingly complex macroeconomic environment, characterized by tariff uncertainty, softening demand in some product categories, foreign-exchange volatility in emerging markets, reduced academic funding, and pricing pressure from budget-constrained hospitals and payers.

Weekly Insights Subscription

Stay ahead with BCG insights on cost management

These challenges are pushing companies to preserve margins and deliver value to shareholders. BCG’s value creator rankings illustrate this shift. Overall total shareholder returns for medtech companies are slowing, with less than one-third of the top 25 companies delivering positive TSR from 2022 to 2024. The common thread for firms delivering positive TSR during this period was both flat to growing EBITDA margins and above-market revenue growth of at least 8% CAGR. (See Exhibit 1.) In contrast, companies with declining EBITDA margins consistently underperformed in TSR, even when they delivered modest revenue growth. (See Exhibit 1.)

Profit Margins Have Had a Sizable Impact on Medtech TSRs Over the Last Three Years, Even for Companies with Modest Gains in Revenue

The Power of a Comprehensive Approach to Cost Reduction

Many medtech leadership teams have launched cost programs but have failed to generate results that meet expectations. To succeed in the current environment, they need an approach that spans the entire end-to-end value chain—beginning with procurement—in order to drive value across all functions. (See Exhibit 2.)

Procurement Is the First Step in Improving Costs Across Medtech Operations

Start with procurement to fund the journey. Procurement is a powerful starting point for cost transformation in medtech, offering quick wins through commercial levers while providing a cross-functional, data-rich view of external spend to support a broader strategic agenda. Targeting select procurement categories based on market insights can deliver great returns. For example, contract research organizations—key suppliers for research and development—are under pressure, creating opportunities for better commercial terms. Similarly, IT managed services are undergoing a major shift, with AI-driven efficiencies reducing client costs by up to 30%. (For other case examples, see “High-Impact Initiatives in Marketing and Freight.”)

High-Impact Initiatives in Marketing and Freight
Each medtech organization will have its own priorities, but in our experience, many can benefit from rethinking marketing and freight costs.
  • Transform marketing and media spend. Marketing and paid media are major cost categories for many medtech companies, and those budgets are often fragmented across business units and geographies, with limited transparency and inconsistent performance tracking. To unlock value, leading organizations are consolidating spend across business units to increase leverage, negotiating rates, and restructuring contracts around delivery KPIs such as audience reach. Companies are also changing how they work with marketing agencies, benchmarking hourly rates, and leveraging GenAI to optimize ad placement and make nonworking spend more efficient. As a result, leading medtech companies have reduced media spend by 30% to 35% in six to nine months. One global medtech player captured $65 million in savings (more than 35% of media spend) and implemented incentive-based contracts, with up to 20% of agency fees tied to results.
  • Take a strategic view of freight. Many organizations manage freight based on service reliability and relationships, often remaining with incumbent vendors over long periods. That means they miss out on opportunities to reduce costs and get better performance. In pricing, spot quotes, which can be higher than contract rates, are common. To improve, top-performing medtech companies are benchmarking their freight costs and those of best-in-class peers, rebidding through global, multivendor RFPs and using custom analytics tools to determine the right vendor, contract, and route. For large organizations, these measures have led to 30% savings across all lanes and pushed contracted lane coverage (which is more efficient than shipping via the spot market) to more than 90%.

Procurement-led programs have delivered significant value for medtech companies, with reductions in the total external spend base ranging from 7% to 12%, and reaching more than 30% in certain high-priority categories. This has delivered gross margin improvement of up to 3 percentage points. Beyond those cost savings, best-in-class initiatives have enabled companies to strengthen supplier partnerships, mitigate supply risks, and establish procurement as a strategic partner, not just a support function.

Conduct a diagnostic to identify problem areas and opportunities. Leading companies start with a full diagnostic of the cost base, identifying high-spend areas and performance gaps. They benchmark both internally (to highlight variations among business units and production sites) and externally (to gauge their performance relative to peers). The diagnostic generates a fact base of accurate data across the full cost structure, including external spend, labor, working capital, and technology, along with the potential value from targeted improvements. Critically, the diagnostic also results in a set of prioritized initiatives across both size of impact and time to value. (See Exhibit 3.)

Companies Need to Prioritize the Right Product Categories Based on the Potential Financial Impact and Time to Value

Apply the full set of procurement cost reduction levers. Once the right priorities are identified, procurement can apply various levers to capture external spend savings across several initiatives:

Expand to other cost priorities. After capturing savings from procurement, medtech companies can reinvest savings from those initiatives into an integrated set of transformation levers across the full value chain, ranging from manufacturing and footprint to process improvement, automation, and inventory. (See “Cost Opportunities Along the Full Value Chain.”)

Cost Opportunities Along the Full Value Chain
Medtech companies have a range of opportunities to reduce costs along the value chain.
  • Rethink manufacturing. A leading medtech company optimized its manufacturing network through strategic outsourcing, lean manufacturing, and network right-sizing. This transformation reduced internal costs and brought down factory overheads by 25%, equivalent to roughly $60 million in projected annual run rate savings. The program was funded through savings from earlier procurement initiatives.
  • Redesign kitting operations. A medtech manufacturer with a substantial kitting business leveraged network consolidation, standardization of kit designs, and labor efficiencies to deliver more than $50 million in annual run rate savings, with payback in less than four years. These improvements represented more than a 20% reduction in kitting conversion costs.
  • Reduce inventory. A medtech manufacturer identified 50% in working capital optimization potential across gross inventory of more than $120 million and used analytics tools to set optimal inventory targets for over 90% of the SKU base. This approach freed up capital while strengthening supply planning, visibility, and accountability.

Some medtech manufacturers have invested in reducing structural costs in their production networks, particularly from fixed overheads. For example, aligning core competencies with the desired manufacturing product mix can lower costs. For capacity allocated to production of nondifferentiated products, competitive bidding has driven savings through cost-effective contract manufacturing alternatives. Make-versus-buy processes that balance cost opportunities with supply resilience can de-risk these changes and ensure reliable supply. Once focused on the right product mix, companies can invest in new capabilities and right-size their footprint for more cost-effective manufacturing.

Other companies have applied a similar approach to kitting operations, which can be fragmented and labor intensive, with wide variations in labor cost, automation, and service models. Leading medtech companies are consolidating networks and standardizing kit designs. Some are applying lean principles and automation to improve labor efficiency and eliminate production bottlenecks. Others are simplifying the product portfolio and introducing modular bundles (such as a base kit plus a preset list of add-ons) to manage complexity.

Many medtech companies are challenged with excess inventory of both raw material and finished goods. Often, manufacturers carry surplus stock as a well-intended—but unnecessary—attempt at managing long lead times and supplier risk (which is often exacerbated by relying on sole suppliers for key components). To reduce inventory, companies can build SKU-level statistical models to define inventory targets based on demand variability and service-level assumptions. They can also reduce hold times for certain SKUs, partner with suppliers to adjust minimum order quantities and contractual buffer stock, and optimize their production scheduling.

Key Success Factors

Although the specific measures will vary among medtech companies, some principles can increase the odds of success in a margin improvement program:


Medtech companies face a tough operating environment, and they need to respond by reducing costs. To date, many cost programs in the industry have been narrowly focused on specific business units or functions, but they can generate better results with a comprehensive approach that spans the entire value chain. Procurement is a natural place to start these initiatives, giving companies an opportunity to generate quick wins, build momentum, and free up capital to fund other measures. It’s a difficult challenge, but the organizations that succeed will deliver a favorable return to shareholders and give themselves a lasting cost advantage over the competition.

The authors thank Ari Platt, Nick Gerwe, and Murilo Oliveira for their contributions to this article.