How Intense is CEO Pressure Right Now?
When asked to rate their overall job-related stress over the last quarter on a scale from 0 (no stress) to 100 (extreme stress), CEOs averaged a rating of 66.7 out of a possible 100—above the clinical threshold typically used to indicate high stress. It’s an aspect of the job that transcends geography: CEOs throughout the world report similarly high stress levels.
Our research suggests that when CEOs perceive their workload as unsustainable, they reach a tipping point where high stress becomes nearly unavoidable, setting them on a path toward burnout. This dynamic can have significant repercussions for leaders’ personal health and for the organizations they lead. Making consistent, high-quality decisions in complex, high-stakes environments is a fundamental requirement of the CEO role, but chronic stress erodes the cognitive functions those decisions depend on—attention, memory, and problem solving—ultimately leading to poorer decision
Stressors and Stakeholders: What’s Driving CEO Pressure
Insights from BCG’s CEO Insomnia Index
- Relentless performance demands drive CEO pressure. Hitting growth targets and managing costs top the list of CEO stressors. Few see relief in sight, with more than half of leaders (60%) expecting operating conditions to remain “challenging” or “very challenging” in the months ahead.
- AI feels energizing today, but the ROI clock is ticking. AI does not rank among the top CEO stressors, but each AI announcement that leaders make raises market expectations and compresses the timeline to deliver measurable results.
- Heightened board scrutiny intensifies CEO pressure. One in three CEOs say they have more to prove to their boards now than they did just six months ago.
- For many CEOs, pressure stems from their own teams. CEOs of companies with revenues over $5 billion rank their senior leadership team as their most stressful stakeholder, and they view their chief financial officer (CFO) as the biggest threat to their job security.
- Near-term pressures are dominating CEOs’ time. More than half of CEOs (57%) say near-term issues consume an outsized share of their time.
- As immediate pressures dominate, CEO turnover risks can go unnoticed. Shareholder activism and rising employee disgruntlement rank low among CEO stressors despite being significant drivers of CEO turnover risk.
Leadership by Design: Navigate the complexities of modern leadership
Further Reading for CEOs
Our Featured Experts on the CEO Agenda
What the Index Reveals About CEO Pressure, CEO Turnover, and CEO Burnout
What leads to CEO turnover?
Our CEO Job Security Model uses a logistic regression approach to explore the likelihood of CEO turnover. The model’s dependent variable is actual CEO exits from the S&P 1200 over the past five years, which we use to predict the likelihood of CEO turnover in the next quarter. The model also uses independent variables including employee net entry rate, sentiment analysis based on earnings call data from BCG’s CEO Data Point Interactive, negative media mentions, total shareholder return, and more.
Is CEO turnover accelerating? And if so, why?
Yes, CEO turnover is accelerating. The reasons are varied:
- Some departures are planned years before a CEO steps down. When done well, succession planning can help cement a CEO’s legacy.
- Not all exits are planned. Some CEOs are forced out of the C-suite by shareholder activists, a reputational crisis, performance misses, or a loss of board confidence.
- CEO burnout is also on the rise.
By focusing on turnover risk factors more within a CEO’s control, the BCG CEO Insomnia Index helps leaders understand what drives stress in the role—and how to safeguard their physical and mental well-being, avoid CEO burnout, and better cope with the isolation that can come with the job.
What does executive burnout look like?
According to the World Health Organization, burnout is a syndrome caused by chronic workplace stress that hasn’t been effectively managed. It is marked by exhaustion or depleted energy, growing detachment or cynicism toward work, and a reduced sense of professional effectiveness.
Drawing on two proprietary sources—a survey of approximately 500 CEOs from leading companies and BCG’s CEO Job Security Model—the BCG CEO Insomnia Index moves beyond defining burnout to analyze what’s driving CEO stress and offer practical guidance for managing it.
What do CEOs struggle with most?
Balancing short-term pressures with long-term strategy is among the most common struggles identified by the BCG CEO Insomnia Index. More than half of CEOs responding to the survey said near-term issues often take up too much of their time and attention. Many also described the role as profoundly isolating, citing boards, employees, and senior leadership teams as their most stressful stakeholders. As one leader put it, the CEO is an “emotional shock absorber.”
The BCG CEO Insomnia Index Methodology
The Index draws from two data sources:
- A proprietary survey of about 500 CEOs from leading companies ($100 million or more in revenue). The survey was designed to assess stress levels, recovery periods, and sustainability while offering deep dives within the six core stress drivers, focusing specifically on the hallmarks of workplace stress: tension, pressure, and scrutiny. The survey period was January 7–21, 2026.
- Five years of CEO turnover data from the S&P 1200.
- Personal stress levels, as self-reported in the CEO Insomnia Index Survey.
- Organizational stress signals, modeled in the CEO Job Security Model.
The CEO Insomnia Index top-line score is based on the average response to a single question: “During the past quarter, how would you rate your overall level of job-related stress, with ‘0’ meaning no stress and ‘100’ meaning extreme stress?” This question was adapted from the Perceived Stress Scale developed by Cohen, Kamarck, and Mermelstein in “A Global Measure of Perceived Stress” (Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983), with the 0–100 range selected to allow greater sensitivity to variation.
CEO stress is defined as a state of mental worry or tension caused by the demands of the CEO role.
Because individual survey responses are anonymized and cannot be linked to company outcomes, CEO turnover was used as a proxy for company-level stress. The model uses a logistic regression approach, with actual CEO exits from the S&P 1200 over the past five years as the dependent variable, predicting the likelihood of CEO turnover in the next quarter. Independent variables include net entry rate, sentiment analysis from our earnings call data, negative media mentions, total shareholder return, and more.
Special thanks to Erik Nook, director of the Logic of Emotion Lab at Princeton University, for his consultation on methodology and approach.