Managing Director & Partner
Chicago
By Ryan Jones, Hasan Alkabeer, Ilya Gorkov, Julia Meisel, Adam Rothman, Mirko Rubeis, and Hubert Schönberger
This article is part of a series examining the competitive outlook for key global process industries and how they can prosper in an uncertain future.
Against a backdrop of slowing demand, high energy costs, and looming regulatory and technological disruptions, the petrochemical industry is poised for significant change. Players will have to adapt to the sector’s evolving dynamics or risk damaging their competitiveness. How they respond to the challenge will determine whether they are future winners or losers. (See “The Future of Process Industries.”)
Following several decades of strong growth driven by high demand, inexpensive capital, technological change, and the rise of China and India, the metals, paper, cement, chemicals, and other basic industries are entering a far more challenging business environment. Geopolitical tensions are increasing along with trade barriers, demand is shifting, aging workers are becoming harder to replace, and regulators, customers, and other stakeholders are raising the sustainability bar. How each of these industries navigates the challenges they face will also affect the fortunes of the many downstream industries that the process industries supply.
Each article in the series will examine the nature of the new business reality faced by a particular process industry and how the coming changes will drive technological progress, redefine the industry’s cost structure, and reshape its competitive landscape. The goal: to provide industry leaders with the data and guidance needed to ensure that their companies can thrive in the coming years.
In this article, we examine eight trends that will shape the future of the petrochemical industry over the next ten years. (See Exhibit 1.)
After the volatility of the COVID-19 era, petrochemicals demand growth is set to weaken over the next ten years, driven by a decelerating global economy and the shift in economic activity toward less materials-intensive sectors. Global GDP is expected to rise by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 2.4% from now through 2035, down from approximately 2.7% from 2014 through 2024. Global petrochemicals demand is projected to grow by around 3% through 2035, compared with 3.3% from 2014 through 2024.
The biggest driver of the coming slowdown is China, where an aging and shrinking population as well as efforts to rebalance the economy toward services and high tech are creating a weaker demand outlook for the domestic petrochemicals sector.
Exhibit 2 shows the scope and de-averaged nature of the worldwide economic slowdown, with more than 70% of global GDP expected to grow more slowly in the next five years than over the past five. But the data also shows that growth in several countries will continue to accelerate. India’s economy, for example, is set to expand by a CAGR of 5% to 7% through 2035.
At this rate, India will become the world’s third-largest economy by 2030. Rising household incomes will drive India’s economic growth, while demand for chemicals and petrochemicals will increase at roughly the same rate as the economy. Strong growth in textiles, packaging, and electrical goods and electronics, as well as the shift of some chemicals-intensive manufacturing into India and out of China to reduce geopolitical risk, will also contribute to demand.
For many petrochemical players, the question they need to answer about the markets of India and Southeast Asia is no longer whether to enter but how. This includes reevaluating their go-to-market strategy and channel options—deciding if they will operate as a pure importer or, if they opt to build a local presence, assessing options for accessing local capacity, feedstock, and pools of demand.
At the same time, customer needs worldwide continue to change rapidly, owing to the impact of regulations and new end-user and consumer preferences. This is especially true of more sustainable materials, including low-carbon and circular ones, where regulations are already changing the field of play. (See Exhibit 3.) For example, several industry estimates suggest that up to 50% of global polyethylene (PE) demand in 2040 could be for low-carbon, circular, and bio-based grades.
Perhaps no topic in petrochemicals is as potentially disruptive, or carries as much uncertainty, as circularity. While some consumer goods companies have announced that they are scaling back ambitions for recycled packaging, the EU has passed the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation. This introduces sweeping new requirements related to recyclability, recycled content, and biodegradability. In addition, the US has signaled its support for caps on virgin polymer production in the ongoing Global Plastics Treaty negotiations, a potentially massive development.
Plenty of variables remain hard to predict globally: whether the negotiations will result in regulations and implementation timelines, whether definitions of “recycling” and “recycled content” can be agreed on that will meet the bar for regulators, what kinds of consumer value propositions the new circular materials will provide, and, above all, what willingness to pay will look like in the long run.
Still, the direction of travel is clear. Despite substantial regional differences, current plastic waste recycling rates are low, at around 10% globally. But with the right investments in collection and sorting infrastructure, those figures could change fast. In our most ambitious scenario, recycling rates for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) could rise from a worldwide average of 10% to 15% today to 35% to 40% over 2035–2040 (inclusive of depolymerization), while the rate for polystyrene (PS), which is less than 3% today, could increase to 15% to 20%. As a result, demand for monoethylene glycol (MEG), a key precursor for PET, could shrink globally under this scenario.
There are several reasons that recycling rates are not higher: municipal waste and recycling infrastructure, consumer behaviors, policy (such as deposit schemes), brand owner packaging design, as well as the capability of mechanical and advanced recycling technologies. These factors also put a reasonable upper bound on future projections. All will need to develop in tandem to materially improve recycling rates.
Achieving our ambitious scenario will require petrochemical companies to make substantial investments, not only in recycling technologies that enable low-cost conversion at scale but also in upstream partnerships that allow less expensive, widespread collection and sorting to meet the demand for waste feedstock.
Petrochemical players are already making these partnerships up and down the value chain. For example, SABIC has partnered with Mars and Landbell Group to create a closed-loop recycling project that uses certified circular polypropylene (PP) derived from mixed-use plastic waste. Meanwhile, Dow Chemical’s recent acquisition of Circulus, which provides high-quality post-consumer recycled (PCR) resin for film applications, is a vote of confidence in mechanical recycling.
Circularity trends also offer a rich opportunity for value-creating innovation. Companies are looking to use technologically advanced materials to enhance functionality (by creating stronger barriers to moisture and oxygen, for example, for a longer shelf life and improved safety) and develop lighter packaging products to help curb emissions. Similarly, automotive players are focusing on recyclable components to reduce waste from end-of-life vehicles.
All these developments will require new capabilities to identify the best customers, sell new value propositions, and price appropriately according to customer willingness to pay. Gone are the days of petrochemicals being monolithic commodities. The emerging environment is placing fresh demands on petrochemical companies’ commercial capabilities. BCG and the World Economic Forum’s recent green go-to-market roadmap for commercializing sustainability in several energy-intensive industries, including chemicals and petrochemicals, highlights a few key commercial imperatives.
Although global capacity additions will be slower than before, we still expect the growth in supply to outpace that in demand. The resulting overcapacity will push utilization rates for petrochemicals factories below historical averages across most key chemical value chains. (See Exhibit 4.)
Here too, there are important regional differences. China’s push for self-sufficiency is impacting global trade flows, while developments in North America and the Middle East are tempering the pace of new additions in those regions. (See “Regional Capacity Trends Will Shape Players’ Investment Strategies.”)
Key regions and countries look set to adopt different approaches to capacity additions and feedstock supply. Here’s what we are expecting over the next ten years:
In the US, as the pace of investment in new domestic petrochemical capacity slows along with the shale boom, we are starting to see feedstock and olefin exports emerge as a new industry dynamic. Inexpensive traveling US ethane is reducing costs for players in Europe, Asia, and Africa, enabling them to fill downstream plants domestically while remaining competitive. For example, Ineos is importing US ethane feedstock using state-of-the-art vessels, providing a cost-effective and reliable supply for its European plants—and other companies are following suit. Demand for exported US ethane increased by 50% from 2019 through 2022 and is set to rise further.
A new, potentially more disruptive source of inexpensive feedstock—namely, trash—could change the game yet again over the longer term. Wide variations in the availability and cost of plastic waste exist worldwide. As circularity becomes more important to overall petrochemical supply production, however, access to inexpensive, high-quality waste will become a new source of advantage.
Other sources of technological disruption include crude-oil-to-chemicals (COTC) technology, which bypasses conventional refining and converts crude directly into petrochemicals. This technology is increasingly being used in China for paraxylene production. COTC makes Chinese production costs far more competitive and will support China’s efforts to become self-sufficient in select petrochemicals. It is already causing some South Korean paraxylene exporters to China, among others, to search for new demand hubs and consider capacity rationalization.
E-technologies (which use electricity from renewable sources to reduce CO2 process emissions), CO2-to-X (carbon transformation), and other circular tech solutions are also expected to disrupt petrochemical supply curves and trade flows. Major chemical and petrochemical players are actively exploring these technologies, and several have established pilot projects. For example, BASF, Linde, and SABIC have created a large-scale e-cracker demonstration plant at BASF’s site in Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Slowing demand, overcapacity, and greater competition will be significant features of the petrochemical industry over the next ten years. According to our calculations, returning utilization rates to historical averages requires the removal of 20 mtpa to 45 mtpa of production capacity across key building blocks—particularly ethylene, propylene, and paraxylene—primarily in China and Europe but also in Northeast Asia. Here are some of the major forces that we expect to impact the balance of supply and demand in the global petrochemicals market during the next decade.
China. Despite a middling position in the global supply curve for most petrochemical products, the country has already achieved technical self-sufficiency in several key products, including methanol, paraxylene, PP, MEG, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and PET. Furthermore, China’s export ambition in PP looks set to increase, adding to established exports in PVC and PET. (See Exhibit 5.)
Europe. The broader European chemical industry is confronted by a number of factors that could affect companies’ international competitiveness, including stagnating demand, the ongoing energy crisis, overdependence on a handful of suppliers, and an ambitious climate regulation agenda (such as domestic carbon pricing, including the Emissions Trading System; and cross-border carbon pricing, such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism). These dynamics are creating either challenges or opportunities depending on the value chains and products.
To overcome these hurdles, European companies are attempting to transform their businesses by finding new ways to boost their competitiveness and establishing green markets in cooperation with policymakers and end-customers.
Leading European players are forging or considering new partnerships with “cracker+1” companies (which normally build and operate a new plant in collaboration with another player) in the Middle East and North America, importing feedstock and key intermediates from outside the region, implementing partial value chain disintegration or global integration opportunities, and applying fixed cost reduction programs.
For European petrochemical producers, green investments have changed from a growth opportunity to a strategic necessity owing to the European Union’s ambitious emission reduction targets.
Even exporters to Europe need to prepare for a challenging commercial environment. Many Middle Eastern players are getting ready for tougher sustainability requirements from European customers and implementing decarbonization programs to reduce the impact of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
Oil and Gas Majors’ Expansion into Petrochemicals. As demand for fuels declines, oil and gas players are actively exploring different growth strategies, including investing in petrochemicals and COTC.
The very high capital requirements of these projects will create barriers to entry, favoring oil and gas companies with strong balance sheets but significantly disrupting smaller, localized, and pure-play petrochemical players.
The next 10 to 20 years in petrochemicals will not look like the past 10 years, or even the past 5. Here are six key imperatives to become the petrochemical winners of tomorrow.
In dynamic times like these, the only certainty is uncertainty. Players should aim to build an advantage for themselves out of this reality by leveraging scenario-based thinking related to key sources of uncertainty and by developing big plans to match the big changes that are on the horizon.
The authors thank Marcus Morawietz, Clint Follette, Susumu Hattori, Marcin Jędrzejewski, Arun Rajamani, Jingshi Hu, Jinyoung Baek, Amit Gandhi, and Veronica Muzoka for their expertise and support in the development of this article.
ABOUT BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP
Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholders—empowering organizations to grow, build sustainable competitive advantage, and drive positive societal impact.
Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that question the status quo and spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting, technology and design, and corporate and digital ventures. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, fueled by the goal of helping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place.
© Boston Consulting Group 2024. All rights reserved.
For information or permission to reprint, please contact BCG at permissions@bcg.com. To find the latest BCG content and register to receive e-alerts on this topic or others, please visit bcg.com. Follow Boston Consulting Group on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter).