Saved To My Saved Content

Growing development needs are facing shrinking budgets. Social impact ecosystem experiences increasing pressure to deliver more with less, while also facing growing sensitivities on gender-related projects. Rather than pulling back, this moment presents an opportunity: systematically integrating a gender lens across development programs offers a powerful but underused lever to enhance impact.

The So What

Women are core to development efforts—not only as members of vulnerable groups, but also as catalysts of progress. When they advance, entire communities move forward. Without this lens, impact falls short of its full potential.

The World Bank estimates that if female employment and entrepreneurship rates were to match those of men, global GDP could increase by more than 20%.

The economic logic is straightforward: women’s economic empowerment (WEE) multiplies impact, benefiting underprivileged groups, communities, and entire economies.

This does not mean shifting focus exclusively to women. Rather, it means systematically ensuring that women are equally included and benefit throughout. This approach is known as gender mainstreaming—the intentional integration of gender considerations across projects, programs, tools, and policies.

Subscribe to our Social Impact E-Alert.

The Backdrop

Women moved to the center of the sustainable development agenda beginning in 1995, when the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action was adopted at the UN’s Fourth World Conference on Women. This catalyzed a wave of targeted initiatives—from microfinance in South Asia to vocational training in East Africa—which demonstrated tangible impact. But while targeted interventions delivered local impact, they were insufficient to dismantle systemic barriers such as restrictive norms and institutional inertia. This led to the start of stronger gender mainstreaming in the 2010s. Since then, funding of projects mainstreaming gender tripled in absolute terms, from $20 billion (2010–2011) to $63 billion (2022–2023), moving from a share of 24% to 42%. (See Exhibit 1.)

From 2010 to 2023, Gender Mainstreaming Official Development Assistance Flows Tripled in Absolute Terms

Initially driven by donors and women-focused players like UN Women, especially in fragile settings, mainstreaming gained traction in the 2010s as large donor states such as Canada and Sweden adopted more “feminist” foreign policies. Such policies seek to integrate gender equality into all areas of foreign policy, helping to ensure that peace negotiations and development assistance benefit everyone by paying attention to the persistent inequalities faced by women and girls. In the Global South, Mexico became the first country to adopt a feminist foreign policy in 2020, and countries such as Rwanda also integrated gender-sensitive policies into national strategies.

Dive Deeper

Most development actors now reference gender and WEE in their strategies. Still, in many cases, women-related considerations are addressed in targeted projects and included as an afterthought in reporting, without a clear theory of change or institutional accountability. There are success stories―organizations that consistently embed WEE in a structured, system-wide way, with dedicated resources, technical capacity, and focus on measurable results.

Understanding how different organizations approach women’s economic empowerment is critical to advancing more integrated and effective WEE models. (See Exhibit 2.)

How Development Players Approach Women's Economic Empowerment

Now What

In BCG’s experience of working with international organizations, moving from intention to action demands a deliberate effort across organizational layers, leveraging committed leadership, accountability, capability building, and WEE-specific monitoring. (See Exhibit 3.)

Moving From Intention to Action on Gender Mainstreaming


Mainstreaming WEE is a powerful driver of impact which remains underutilized across much of the development sector. To realize its full potential, it must be embedded across strategies, systems, and operations—not as an add-on, but as a fundamental approach.