A growing number of large institutional investors today are incorporating ESG metrics into their capital allocation and stewardship criteria. This shift toward sustainable finance—which has evolved beyond socially responsible investing to include asset management and ownership—has profound implications for investors and companies alike.
Some of the largest and most influential institutional investors and asset managers are at the forefront of a powerful movement to add environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) standards to their criteria for capital allocation. As long-term stewards of capital, they recognize a mandate to consider whether the companies they own today will maintain a strong connection both with their customers and extended communities as environmental and social challenges increasingly impact the way we live and work. They also recognize that companies that commit to addressing these urgent issues stand to realize greater business opportunities in the future—and thus will achieve higher returns for their long-term shareholders.
It hasn’t been easy for investors to assess a company’s ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance. WEF and BCG are shedding light on the financial materiality of ESG factors and how those factors will evolve.
Institutional investors that are best poised for the future are those that actively engage with companies through the “power of purpose” instead of simply liquidating their shares and walking away from positions they perceive as questionable in the new climate. Such investors are far better placed to push their holdings in the direction of long-term sustainability through such measures as voting proxies and shareholder resolutions—or by initiating open dialogue with company leaders. Private sector companies and investors that follow this strategy can carve out a far more active role for themselves in the quest for diversity, environmental sustainability, and other important societal goals.
Two trending developments are motivating large investors to embrace sustainable finance and to engage directly with corporate executives and boards:
Total societal impact (TSI) is a framework that companies and investors can use to diagnose specific levers that drive both total shareholder return and societal impact. BCG recently used TSI to study the relationship between, on one side, performance on ESG issues such as inclusive supply chains and environmental impact, and on the other, market valuation multiples and margins. BCG found that ESG metrics were statistically significant in predicting the valuation multiples of companies in all the industries it analyzed. Moreover, investors rewarded the top performers on specific aspects of ESG with multiples that were 3% to 19% higher, all else being equal, than those of the median performers. Top performers on some issues had margins up to 12.4 percentage points higher.
This contrast is likely to become more dramatic over time as sustainability considerations move closer to the bottom line at many companies. When Pacific Gas & Electric, the largest US utility, filed for bankruptcy in the wake of California’s catastrophic wildfires, it cited climate change as a material cause of its petition. It was the first time that climate change was specifically cited in such a context.
To guard against exposure to such events, investors understand that they can no longer treat sustainable financing as a niche practice. Asset managers, too, are increasingly shifting from policies that seek to avoid risk by excluding specific securities, in favor of strategies aimed at benefiting from companies that perform better on TSI issues. Examples include best-in-class and thematic investing; impact investments, such as low-carbon indices and green bonds; and seeking out companies that score well on gender diversity.
As of 2018, $30.7 trillion was being professionally managed globally under responsible investment strategies ranging from negative/exclusionary screening to corporate engagement…
…an increase of 34% in just two years, according to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance’s annual review.
These are still early days, however. Soon, we are likely to see sustainable financing morph into a more integrated, intentional approach. Investors will apply ESG integration and best-in-class analysis across all categories of assets in order to enhance their risk and return performance. Active ownership, too, will become an integrated model, with investors routinely engaging with boards and CEOs on companies’ efforts to increase diversity and address their environmental performance, just as they do now on executive compensation, corporate governance, and shareholder rights. Norms and negative screening will be used to inform engagement, not trigger exclusion.
Driving these developments is the increasingly critical role that private sector companies will play in addressing climate change, diversity, and other important societal issues—with large investors pushing them along this positive path. However, translating this investment strategy into tangible financial results for shareholders, both in the short and long term, requires insights into the steps that companies must take to heighten the impact and sustainability of their business models.
BCG's Vinay Shandal and Bob Eccles discuss how COVID-19 has impacted what matters to investors, while opening up an opportunity for a new global set of standards.
How Impact-Linked Finance Can Accelerate the SDGs
BCG collaborated with Roots of Impact to define and accelerate the concept of “impact-linked finance”—an alternative funding mechanism for the SDGs.
Learn more about our work with Roots of Impact
BCG's consultants and industry experts focusing on socially responsible investing continue to partner with leading investors, asset managers, and private sector companies to support sustainable investment practices. These are some of our experts on this topic.
