Managing Director & Partner
A systematic approach to postpandemic ways of working can capture the upsides of these models while mitigating the risks.
How can we preserve the benefits of remote or hybrid work as offices reopen without unintentionally institutionalizing the downsides of virtual models? That is the question facing many employers today.
Over the past 12 months, many organizations have found unexpected benefits in remote and hybrid work—more digitally enabled operating models, redesigned footprints to support innovation, enhanced means of collaboration—and they are eager to optimize these advantages. These employers recognize they are in a position to build a foundation for near- and longer-term change in the ways that work gets done. Employees too are interested in ongoing flexibility in where they work, when they work, or both. These aspirations will redefine ways of working.
But it’s not as simple as just extending current remote work options postpandemic. In the forced transition to remote work, many leaders and organizations had to quickly adjust. While some leaders and companies figured out new ways to build the human connection remotely and to preserve creativity, many organizations struggled in this regard. Within months of the initial shift to remote working, employees who had high levels of social connectedness felt that they had maintained or improved individual productivity relative to their pre-COVID state. Yet even these socially connected employees found that collaborative tasks were still quite challenging. Furthermore, while many were able to maintain close connections with immediate team members, most found that their weaker connections had deteriorated—putting creativity and innovation at risk. Now, after a year in the largely remote working mode, many employees are feeling real burnout and digital overload: meeting volumes have increased nearly 150%, and 40% of employees report feeling overworked, exhausted, or both.
Employers that seek to sustain remote or hybrid models must do so thoughtfully to capture the upsides of new ways of working while mitigating the risks. We’ve worked with organizations across sectors—in health care, education, finance, consumer goods, and more—and we’ve distilled the following methodology and emerging best practices for leaders to use when determining and implementing the right work models. While we are still early in this transition and will undoubtedly learn more over the coming months, these practices can serve as guideposts as companies begin the next phase in the future of work.
Companies are currently experimenting with a wide range of potential work models. (See Exhibit 1.) Deciding which ones are best for a particular organization entails understanding the nature of the work being done, the teams involved, and the preferences of individuals. Here is a methodology for assessing these three factors to inform work model choices.
Ground your assessment in the nature of the work being done and core business objectives. Organizations must begin by assessing their remote readiness on the basis of the activities to be performed. They should consider the extent to which activities are relatively more independent or more collaborative, more complex or routinized, to determine their remote readiness. Relatively independent and routinized activities (as opposed to relatively collaborative and creative ones) tend to be more remote ready. (See Exhibit 2.) Leaders should contextualize this in the understanding that the nature of work for many functions was already shifting prepandemic and will likely evolve further (becoming more digitized, automated, or AI-enabled); these shifts may increase the proportion of work that is remote ready.
Organizations should then determine the key business objectives they are trying to optimize. An organization seeking to maximize employee choice and flexibility in order to win in a tight talent market may choose a different set of work models than one that is trying to achieve near-term cost-savings by reducing its real estate footprint.
Orient at the team level. Looking at the nature of the work that teams do is especially useful in determining the specific subset of work models that are most relevant to an organization. We recommend making work model choices on the basis of assessments at the team level, rather than the individual level, because the nature of work tends to vary more at the team level. We recognize that teams can be organized in multiple different ways including by department, function, or project, and some employees may be part of several teams simultaneously. As such, leaders may need to assess the nature of work being done from a variety of perspectives.
Some emerging practices can help make hybrid teams more effective. For example, encouraging members to align on when they are onsite versus offsite can ensure sufficient in-person collaboration time. Leaders can also conduct “sense checks” across the organization to ensure adequate overlap of the onsite work schedules of key stakeholders on teams that frequently work together.
Be responsive to individual preferences. After the best-fit model is selected for a team, leaders should try to accommodate differing employee needs and preferences. Doing so can help improve employee satisfaction, drive productivity, and increase retention. While some employees may perceive remote work as a benefit, others may regard it as a burden. Employers should try to be as equitable as possible in responding to employee preferences. For instance, they might consider providing commuting stipends for employees who work onsite to parallel work-from-home stipends for those who work mostly or entirely offsite.
The transition to remote and hybrid work last year was abrupt and full of uncertainty. But lessons were learned and adjustments were made. Here are some emerging best practices that will help organizations transition to new work models.
Experiment, test, and iterate. The single most important success factor is to instill a mindset of test and learn as organizations navigate the transition. Although a few organizations (including Salesforce and Twitter) have publicly committed to permanent work model changes, many others are hesitant to make definitive changes in the face of an uncertain future. Even so, organizations can move quickly by piloting new models before rolling them out at scale. Where possible, teams should maintain the chosen model for three to six months in order to preserve predictability and allow time for teams to adapt and refine. During that time, team leaders should regularly gauge what is working and what is not in order to make rapid adjustments to balance and preserve productivity, innovation, and flexibility.
Establishing cross-unit learning forums to share lessons learned and create a living repository of best practices will also help organizations increase their long-term adaptability. Some cross-company learning ecosystems are already in place—for instance, the Flexwork coalition (led by Palo Alto Networks, Box, Splunk, Uber, and Zoom) and the Future Forum (convened by Slack, Fortune, BCG, Management Leadership for Tomorrow, and Herman Miller).
Favor simplicity. One critical emerging best practice is to narrow the set of hybrid work models to the two or three models that are most relevant to the way an organization operates, given its core business objectives and the nature of the work being done. Avoiding a profusion of work models helps to limit the complexity of managing across teams and to preserve productivity.
Design for equity from the start. Many leaders are concerned about designing models that are fair to both onsite and remote workers. When possible, we suggest arranging for meetings to be entirely onsite or entirely remote to prevent the inadvertent creation of in-groups and out-groups in the hybrid meeting context. Organizations should also consider balancing benefits between onsite and remote employees to mitigate the risks of inequity. Leaders can establish explicit approaches (such as pulse checks or town halls) to understand employees’ experiences and to commit to transparently measuring and reporting on the ongoing impact of the transition on subpopulations.
Don’t forget enabling supports. In addition to determining the work models themselves, organizations must consider the elements that will support implementation. (See Exhibit 3.) Five such elements are critical:
Without such enabling supports, organizations may not fully realize the benefits of new work models. Many have found it helpful to establish a cross-functional team to design and deploy these enablers, in tandem with assessing remote readiness and aggregating learning experiences across the organization.
Engage senior leaders in change management. After a long year, uncertainty about the future pervades many workplaces. Vocal and visible senior leadership is essential in supporting employees in the upcoming transition. Leaders should also consider engaging employees from all ranks in designing models and clearly articulate the value proposition at both the enterprise level and the individual level. Throughout, leaders must commit to communicating transparently about what is known and what isn’t and about what is working and what is not.
The opportunity presented by the postpandemic “return” to work is about more than just determining what types of hybrid and remote models will help to retain employees. Organizations rarely have the opportunity to boldly rethink how work gets done; factors such as near-term financial pressures and organizational resistance to change often get in the way. We encourage leaders to take advantage of this unique moment to experiment with new work models that can unleash new sources of productivity, innovation, and value.