Managing Director & Senior Partner; Global Director, BCG Henderson Institute
This is the first in a series of articles about the future of technology in Europe. Here, we discuss the need for industry to undertake a dramatic digital transformation.
For decades, the European economy has been characterized by industry and, even today, its importance cannot be overstated. According to the European Commission (EC), industry accounts for 80% of Europe’s exports and private innovations, and in sectors such as automotive, building materials, and luxury goods, European players are global leaders.
Times are changing, however, and the current COVID-19 crisis is a dire reminder that firms’ level of digitization coincides with both their resilience in the face of such unexpected events and their competitiveness in a new business reality centered on digital. For instance, this crisis highlights how advanced robotics can enable companies to continue operating autonomous factories in spite of containment measures, how machine learning and data analytics allow us to detect early signs of change in customer preferences, and how AI-augmented supply chain management increases a firm’s agility in responding to fast and drastic changes in supply and demand.
Assessing the level of Europe’s digitization should start at the source, with the tech industry, where Europe is clearly lagging. All tech giants are based in the US and China, and these countries also have acquired the most promising European startups (such as Skype and DeepMind) in past years, leaving Europe with very few “unicorns” today (only 11% of the worldwide total).
Furthermore, the tech industry can no longer be regarded in isolation. It is telling that in only five years’ time, Alibaba managed to create the world’s largest money market fund.
Notes: 1 It was the largest at some point in 2019, after which it shrank because of regulatory pressures aiming to decrease systemic risks.
Especially in light of the grave economic consequences of COVID-19, the time for Europe to act is now. In previous crises, the key to thriving in the post-crisis world has been to make transformational moves, taking into account long-term goals. Digitizing will be this type of move for European industry players. If they fail to make this digital transformation, they will wake up in a new reality, where the logic of competitive advantage will inevitably be different.
BCG research sheds light on companies’ digital maturity across regions.
The question is what causes this disparity? It is not that European small and midsize entities (SMEs) are different in nature. When surveying thousands of SMEs across China, the US, and Europe, we find that they all face very similar issues hampering further digitization: a lack of financial resources, technical capabilities, and talent. So if the difference is not in initial SME capabilities, what then is behind this disparity in digital maturity?
In the US, a Schumpeterian “creative destruction” process—companies that are losing their competitive edge are swiftly replaced by more productive ones—operates relentlessly. Laggards either upgrade their digital capabilities or risk being disrupted. Although this Schumpeterian process has also played a role in China, comparatively more focus has been placed on transforming traditional industry players. Europe needs exactly this type of change, with its current strong industrial position and lack of technology scale-ups. To plan for this type of transformation, a full understanding of what drives China’s success is helpful. (See Exhibit 2.)
As so often in China, governments play a critical enabling role. The central government is responsible for coordination. It sets the overall ambition, distributes funds, and ensures coordination. The difficult choices it makes are crucial to this coordination. To avoid wasteful duplication, it gives support only when an industry has a comparative competitive advantage in a certain location. To the contrary, if there is no comparative advantage, the location’s focus needs to shift to other economic activities. In this way, the central government ensures an adequate number of competitive industrial ecosystems arises across the country.
Nevertheless, provincial and regional governments do play the most active role. They independently plan and implement digitization strategies. They follow three key principles:
This approach has tremendous impact. For example, the Guangzhou provincial government is working with Alibaba on a large-scale, smart-manufacturing plan, which aims to bring 20,000 companies to the cloud by mid-2021.
The strongest digitization pull on industry players comes from Chinese digital orchestrators. These include Alibaba, Tencent, and Haier. Here we define digital orchestrators broadly, including purely digital players but increasingly also hybrid ecosystem orchestrators.
Many examples of platform orchestrators digitizing SMEs have made headlines over the past few years. The most high-profile ones are Alibaba and JD.com, which are digitizing the fragmented Chinese retail industry. By offering digital infrastructures to shop owners for free, these digital giants managed to digitize over one-third of China’s 6 million stores in less than two years. In return, shop owners agreed to share data, reinforcing the digital ecosystems and serving as fulfillment and delivery centers. Haier is another great example with its COSMOPlat platform, which integrates more than 4 million SMEs to foster mass customization in manufacturing.
But this pull is not limited to SMEs—it has impacted industrial giants in meaningful ways as well. Indeed, as most of their up- and downstream partners go digital with the help of orchestrators, these larger companies are indirectly forced to follow suit. Failing to do so may eventually result in ecosystem exclusion.
Through its strong focus on government coordination and digital orchestrators, China develops a win-win-win:
There is no such win-win-win in Europe because the region fails on the dimensions that enable the Chinese model. (See Exhibit 3.) Europe is aware of the critical need to digitize its industry. “A Europe fit for the digital age” is one of the key priorities of the new EC, and the EU’s budget appropriation to drive the digital agenda for 2021–2027 is 1.6 times higher than before. To digitize its industry, Europe needs to address two problems.
First, European government action is too fragmented. The lack of central coordination, planning, and prioritization hinders the actual impact of any actions taken. Indeed, as US venture capitalist and cofounder of Netscape (the first dominant web browser) Marc Andreesen notes, Europe doesn’t need 50 Silicon Valleys. It needs distinct variations, each focusing on its comparative advantage. The EC’s Digital Innovation Hub (DIH) initiative is revealing. The organization spent €500 million to support the setup of DIHs, which help SMEs to test digital technologies and train companies in the use of these new technologies. Now, the EU is home to 450 digital hubs, more than twice the number in China. This regional focus (“one hub per region per industry”) has spread resources too thin, resulting in subscale efforts and duplication.
Second, European digital ecosystem orchestrators do not exist, which has negative consequences. One issue is that European SMEs experience less of a natural pull to digitize. Therefore, they are required to act independently in a bottom-up manner, resulting in slower increases in digital maturity. In addition, European industry players end up overseas when looking for partnerships. This puts them at a disadvantage, as they have to operate according to foreign standards and regulations.
Europe urgently needs to address these two problems if it hopes to maintain the competitiveness of its industry. How can it do so?
First, European governments should immediately start creating the conditions for European homegrown platform companies to emerge, rise, and thrive. To do so, the EC should:
Still, as Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess pragmatically points out, today “we don’t have the big tech companies here and you need tech companies to partner with. Therefore, either we can go to the US West Coast or we can go to China.” Until such European digital giants emerge, Europe needs a concrete workaround to “catch the train” of digital in industry and keep the region from falling further behind. A preferred option would be the “Europeanization” of foreign digital players, ensuring immediate impact while reducing over-reliance on foreign technology. To lead in their relationship with foreign digital giants, companies and governments should jointly:
This challenge is not one just for Europe’s industry players. To continue thriving in Europe, digital ecosystem orchestrators need to rethink the way they operate. Committing to European value creation needs to become a principle guiding strategic choices, rather than a compliance effort.
Furthermore, independent from government action, European industrial players urgently need to become fully digital-ready. To reach that stage, they should:
During the 19th century, China was the biggest economic power with one-third of global GDP. But it missed the second industrial revolution and became a colony. Let’s not allow Europe to follow the same path in the 21st century by missing the digital revolution and becoming a digital colony of the US and China. Europe has great assets but only if united: it is the leading region in terms of the absolute number of AI talent, and at least one-third of the 40 top universities in AI research are European. We believe that, to address Europe’s digitization trap, policymakers and companies have a joint and coordinated role to play. And there is an urgency to act. Europe can succeed, but only if it can embrace the change. As Lampedusa wrote: “If we want nothing to change, we need everything to change!”
The BCG Henderson Institute is Boston Consulting Group’s strategy think tank, dedicated to exploring and developing valuable new insights from business, technology, and science by embracing the powerful technology of ideas. The Institute engages leaders in provocative discussion and experimentation to expand the boundaries of business theory and practice and to translate innovative ideas from within and beyond business. For more ideas and inspiration from the Institute, please visit our website and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.