Saved To My Saved Content
Download Article

At first glance, CEOs and boards appear to agree on how AI should be governed, implemented, and valued. Look closer, however, and you’ll see critical gaps that could hinder a successful AI transformation.

In this first edition of Split Decisions: The BCG CEOs and Boards Survey, responses from 625 leaders around the world reveal five areas where chief executives and their boards of directors diverge on AI:

At a moment when clear, coordinated leadership is essential, these fault lines could create tension in the boardroom. Explore our findings in greater detail in the following pages.

Methodology
The inaugural Split Decisions: The BCG CEOs and Boards Survey focused on AI and surveyed 351 CEOs and 274 board members of leading companies (with $100 million or more in annual revenue). Of the respondents, 44% were US-based. Further, 76% of respondents represented private companies and 24% represented public companies.

CEOs Say AI Hype Is Distorting Boardroom Judgment

When asked what they wish their boards would do differently regarding AI, more than half of CEOs said boards need to better understand the gap between headline AI hype and reality. Simultaneously, boards felt that CEOs need to do a better job selling them on their AI strategy. In our survey, many write-in comments emphasized the need for more proactive communication regarding CEOs’ vision for AI.

CEOs Wish Boards Would...Boards Wish CEOs Would...

Boards Think They Know AI. CEOs Challenge That Self-Assessment.

While 75% of board members believe their AI knowledge is on par with or more advanced than that of their peers, CEOs have a different perspective. More than one-third of CEOs believe boards overestimate the human capabilities AI can replace, and nearly 40% say boards lack an informed view of how AI is reshaping growth strategy.

Charts show 63% of CEOs think boards overestimate AI capabilities; 75% of boards claim sufficient or advanced AI literacy.
CEOs Wish Boards Would...Boards Wish CEOs would...
Weekly Insights Subscription

Stay ahead with BCG insights on artificial intelligence

Limited AI Understanding Leads to Board FOMO

Approximately 60% of CEOs believe their boards are rushing AI transformation. What’s more, our data suggests that lower levels of self-assessed AI understanding may be fueling board FOMO (fear of missing out). Board members with less confidence in their AI knowledge are more likely to believe their organizations are moving too slowly, indicating that uncertainty is translating into a heightened sense of urgency. At the same time, our research finds that frustration with the pace of adoption is highest in those who have a more permissive view on governance, underscoring a growing tension between the desire for speed and the need for oversight.

Charts show 61% of CEOs say boards rush AI; 80% of boards uncertain about AI say the pace is too slow or inconsistent.
CEOs Wish Boards would...Boards Wish Ceos Would...

AI Should Be Led by the Executive Leadership Team, Boards and CEOs Say. But CEOs Do the Heavy Lifting.

The majority of board members and chief executives agree that AI strategy should belong with the executive leadership team, but in practice CEOs still take the lead. According to 47% of CEOs, they are heading up AI implementation, with 39% of board members reporting the same. What’s more, fewer than 10% of both boards and CEOs believe that AI strategy should be led by a chief AI officer, reinforcing the position that all C-suite roles—such as the chief marketing officer, chief people officer, and chief transformation officer—have a role to play in AI implementation.

Bar charts show 26% of CEOs and 23% of boards say CEOs should make AI decisions, but more say that CEOs actually do it.
CEOs and Boards Are Aligned on AI in Theory, but Divided in Practice | Quote 4

CEOs Put More Weight on AI in Their Performance Reviews Than Boards Do

Despite growing pressure to deliver on AI, boards think that only about a quarter of a CEO’s performance review pivots on meeting AI ROI goals. CEOs, however, believe that more than a third of their performance is tied to AI outcomes. This suggests a gap between perceived expectations and formal accountability.

Bar charts show how much of a CEO’s performance review depends on meeting AI ROI goals: 35% per CEOs, 27% per boards.
CEOs and Boards Are Aligned on AI in Theory, but Divided in Practice | Quote 5

AI Literacy Is Now a Must-Have Skill for Board Membership

Given the apparent disconnect between CEOs and boards on crucial AI issues, it’s no surprise that AI literacy is rapidly becoming a baseline expectation for board membership, not a differentiator. We found that 79% of CEOs and 80% of board members believe that prospective members should be required to demonstrate a measurable understanding of how AI can reshape their industry.

CEOs and Boards Are Aligned on AI in Theory, but Divided in Practice | Quote 5